2009/03/28

Joel Greenblatt, the lesser known Buffett


It is very interesting to see how the seeds have spread out from Benjamin Graham's Net Current Asset Value (NCAV) Strategy. There have been over dozens of very successful and well known investors that reside in the Graham and Doddsville. Joel Greenblatt, a stronger believer in value investing, published a nice and simple book called "The Little Book that Beats the Market". Very similar to Chris Browne's little book of value investing (earlier post) in terms of simplicity, yet filled with amazing insights.

Value Investing Encyclopedia prepared a very nice profile on Joel Greenblatt, and I just want to share the following quotes that both men would agree on what exactly are "value" and "attractive"

The following is from Buffet's letter to shareholders in 1992:
“But how, you will ask, does one decide what's "attractive"? In answering this question, most analysts feel they must choose between two approaches customarily thought to be in opposition: "value" and "growth." Indeed, many investment professionals see any mixing of the two terms as a form of intellectual cross- dressing.”
“We view that as fuzzy thinking (in which, it must be confessed, I myself engaged some years ago). In our opinion, the two approaches are joined at the hip: Growth is always a component in the calculation of value, constituting a variable whose importance can range from negligible to enormous and whose impact can be negative as well as positive.”
“In addition, we think the very term "value investing" is redundant. What is "investing" if it is not the act of seeking value at least sufficient to justify the amount paid? Consciously paying more for a stock than its calculated value - in the hope that it can soon be sold for a still-higher price - should be labeled speculation (which is neither illegal, immoral nor - in our view - financially fattening).”


Finally, I want to share a link I found for another amazing value based blogger David on Joel Greenblatt talks about his magic formula investing at 2006 Columbia Reunion.
Click here.

2009/03/19

Warren Buffett’s Possible Shopping List


Bloomberg published an interesting article today speculating what Mr. Buffett might buy in this market.

According to Berkshire's
2008 annual report, the shopping list criteria includes:
(1) Large purchases (at least $75 million of pre-tax earnings unless the business will fit into one of our existing units),
(2) Demonstrated consistent earning power (future projections are of no interest to us, nor are “turnaround” situations),
(3) Businesses earning good returns on equity while employing little or no debt,
(4) Management in place (we can’t supply it),
(5) Simple businesses (if there’s lots of technology, we won’t understand it),
(6) An offering price (we don’t want to waste our time or that of the seller by talking, even preliminarily, about a transaction when price is unknown).
And Bloomberg uncovered the following companies:

Aetna Chubb Kohl’s Smith International
Aflac Computer Sciences Loews Corp. Southern Copper
Agilent Technologies Covidien Marathon Oil Southwestern Energy
Allergan Danaher McKesson St. Jude Medical
Anadarko Petroleum EOG Resources Newmont Mining Staples
Aon General Dynamics Noble Corp. Sysco
Archer Daniels Midland Halliburton Noble Energy TJX
Baker Hughes Hess Nucor Union Pacific
Becton Dickinson Illinois Tool Works Precision Castparts VF
Brown-Forman Intercontinental Exchange Raytheon WellPoint
Bunge Intuit Reynolds American W.W. Grainger
Cardinal Health ITT Rockwell Collins Zimmer Holdings
Carnival
SAIC

In the article, it stated:
There are 50 U.S. companies with that much market value and profit, a return on equity exceeding 10 percent and a debt-to- equity ratio less than 50 percent...Sysco, VF and Danaher are also the sort of easy-to-understand businesses that Buffett favors.
Among the companies meeting the criteria, 12 have price-to- earnings multiples of no more than 7. They include Houston-based Marathon Oil Corp.; Aflac Inc., an insurer based in Columbus, Georgia; and steelmaker Nucor Corp. of Charlotte, North Carolina.

According to What Has Worked In Investing, published by Tweedy, Browne Company LLC, stocks with low p/e ratio have a higher probability in future price appreciation.
Low Price in Relation to Earnings -
Stocks bought at low price/earnings ratios afford higher earnings yields than stocks bought at higher ratios of price-to-earnings. The earnings yield is the yield which shareholders would receive if all the earnings were paid out as a dividend. Benjamin Graham recommended investing in companies whose earnings yield was 200% of the yield on AAA bonds. Investing in stocks that are priced low in relation to earnings does not preclude investments in companies whose earnings are expected to grow in the future. To paraphrase Warren Buffett, “value” and “growth” are joined at the hip. A company priced low in relation to earnings, whose earnings are expected to grow, is preferable to a similarly priced company whose earnings are not expected to grow. Price is the key. Included within this broad low price in relation to earnings category are high dividend yields and low prices in relation to cash flow (earnings plus depreciation expense).

2009/03/07

Lecture materials that might be applicable to real world?!


So I am sitting in a random Starbucks as usual wondering off my mind here and there, while squeezing in some studying time on my upcoming exam.

I haven't checked the CBOE volatility index (definition here), but we are in some pretty wacky environment with S&P hitting new lows since 1997. There are a number of experts predicting the S&P could go down to 600 or 400, and on top of that the negative feedback loop is going full speed across consumer and business spending sectors (I have to admit I am one of the herd that asked my family to delay the upgrade of a newer, shiner, and much bigger LCD TV as opposed to the 27" 15 years old tube TV that currently sits in the living room).

I don't know how low the market will go, but I would like to share some of the lecture materials in my CFA studying that hopefully can provide you with some encouraging information about our doomed financial market. Stock prices has been known as one of the leading economic indicators, and the earning power of the underlying firms plays an important role in determining which direction the stock prices might go.

To estimate earning power, there are three different methods suggested by the lecture:
  1. Estimate net profit margins based on recent trends
  2. Estimate net profit before tax margin
  3. Estimate operating profit margin, which is defined as the earnings before interest, taxes depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margin percentage
The book argued that estimating EBITDA is the best method because this measure is before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, so it will provide more stable estimates of net profits than the other two methods.

Taking it word for word, we also examine the factors that may affect EBITDA estimates
  1. Capacity utilization - There is a positive relationship between profit margin and capacity utilization. As production increases, there should be a decrease in per-unit fixed costs because costs are spread over a greater number of goods
  2. Unit labor costs - There is a negative relationship between unit labor costs and operating profit margins because labor costs are the major variable costs of a firm.
  3. Rate of inflation - There are three possible effects that an increase in inflation can have on profit margins, they are either positive, negative, or indifferent. Usually it's a negative relationship because firm faces elastic demand for its products and will not be able to fully pass on the inflation to its customers
In addition, these relationship are also influenced by the business cycle. Immediately following a recession, capacity utilization will be low and utilization will increase sharply as the economy recovers. Labor will also not be bargaining for pay increases at this time so there will be small increases or even decreases in unit labor costs. Thus, profit margins increase greatly in the initial stages of a recovery.

Every recession is different, and the one we currently face is on a global scale for the first time. The drop has been deep and severe with no recovery visible in sight. However, we are currently two years into the financial crisis, and one has to wonder how much more can the overall market decline in the next two to five years. We are close to a point where prudent businesses face favorable factors to increase their bottom line, yet they are currently traded like their junked competitors (Berkshire Hathaway comes to mind).

"If you like it at $50, you will like it at $40, if you like it at $40, you will love it at $20", the people who try to sell you technical trading platforms/strategies usually say it sarcastically. The price argument is very misleading from a technical or fundamental buy and hold approach. The current stock price is just a scorecard that the market assigns. It is the underlying business that only matters.

Just because I paid something for $50, it should not influence my future decision on the price I am willing to pay. Examine the business as you were the owner, and I am sure you will be more comfortable with the recent plunge. If the business's prospect has deteriorated,
and it was doing well in the last couple years only because of leverage and/or credit boom, realize our mistakes and get rid of its shares. The probability of poor business to recover is much lower than a better business. It will be a painful lesson, but mistakes provide us with valuable lessons and aid us to become better investors.


(All materials are from 2008 Kaplan Schweser CFA level III Books, and I don't own Berkshire Hathaway shares)

2009/03/01

Lectures from Columbia University on Value Investing

http://valueinvestingresource.blogspot.com/2008/05/lectures-from-columbia-universitys.html

Great lectures and I would recommend any stock enthusiast to view them. What's better than great education for free?

Christopher Browne, one of my favorite investment guru who wrote the "Little Book of Value Investing," has two lecture videos in this series.

The follow are some of his speech that I tried to rephrase:

- At the end of the day, management totally counts and it's really the intangible thing that is hard to figure out

- You just have to do the hard work trying to figure out what is the business plan

- Exit business when you believe they are close or above what your research tells you. But if it's an exceptional business, it is worth hanging on as you would as a private business.

- You should view your investment as buying a share of the business, whatever the stock market does should have no influence on your decision

- Buying stock has a lot of similarity to buying a piece of real estate